Housing Bailout Masquerades as Stimulus

Andrew Jeffery  Feb 08, 2008 10:15 am

Housing Bailout Masquerades as Stimulus
 
Fannie and Freddie asked to save the mortgage market.
 

 
The only viable long term solution for the mortgage problem is to allow prices to return to levels that are affordable in a traditional lending environment. But, in the interim, Washington may have succeeded in buying itself some time by increasing loan limits for Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE).

Only the most Pollyannaish would argue that mailing checks to the spending vacuum that is the American consumer is an effective way to bolster the economy, so the true motivation for the unusually quick congressional action is for Fannie and Freddie to step in and support housing values.

The implicit government guarantee these companies carry has allowed them to be the sole source of liquidity since the secondary market for mortgages seized up last summer. However, even though Fannie and Freddie control the market for prime mortgages, they are unable to buy loans with a face value greater than $417,000.

High home prices and a stalled jumbo loan market mean potential buyers in areas with the fastest home price depreciation like California, Arizona, Nevada and Florida can barely find a loan. Combined with rampant speculation and exotic mortgages, illiquidity in the market for big loans has exacerbated the home price decline.

Even if expanding the reach of these institutions does jumpstart the market, its effects may not be as far-reaching as regulators hope. Fannie and Freddie's underwriting guidelines are tighter than most private lenders, so borrowers must have good credit and post sizable down payments to qualify.

At best, Congress's ruse will provide fodder for the November election as each party stakes its claim as savior of the American economy. At worst, by delaying the inevitable Washington has increased the severity of the eventual day of reckoning.
Rate this article: (0 Votes)
Comments (7) See All Comments »
02-08-2008, 1:01 pm
Well first off, the cap had been raised sometime in the last 5 to 10 years so it's not like they have been stagnant.

Second, both Fannie and Freddie are dealing with rising loan delinquency/loss rates and trying to raise capital
Read More
02-08-2008, 5:41 pm
Thomas,

I found an article on Bloomberg that has some more details on how the changes to Fannie and Freddie will actually effec the market.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=albzArCDnWsI&refer=home
Read More
02-08-2008, 10:22 pm
So if we were to agree that housing is beyond the coverage ratio of the average wage earner. Why would you raise the cap? That to me is like saying... OK too many people are getting pulled over for drunk driving let's raise the legal limit. I
Read More
02-08-2008, 11:54 pm
Freddie & Fannie are close to going under now. What will happen when these two are politically pushed to take on thousands of
$600,000 mortgages in a collapsing housing market?

Got GOLD?

Edmund OShea
Read More
02-09-2008, 3:38 am
Touche!

Here in California, and most other places I assume, properrty taxes
round out to 1% of the "sale value amount."

At $600,000 that comes in at $6K a year, or $500/month on top of
the P&I pa
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



Andrew Jeffery is an Editor at Minyanville Publishing & Multimedia, LLC.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any article or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Publishing and Multimedia, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Markets

our professors

rss article alert