Five Things You Need to Know: Existing Home Sales; Who Cares? Part I; Who Cares? Part II; Conspiracy of Excess Liquidity Mongers; What a Difference a Day Makes Kevin Depew Jun 25, 2007 12:00 pm |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
Minyanville's daily Five Things You Need to Know to stay ahead of the pack on Wall Street:
1. Existing Home Sales
Sales of Existing Homes fell 0.3% in May to an annualized rate of 5.99 million, the National Association of Realtors said.
- Sales of previously owned homes fell 0.3% in May to the lowest in almost four years, the NAR reported.
- Sales last month were down 10.3% year-over-year.
- Meanwhile, the supply of unsold homes jumped to the highest in almost 15 years.
- The national median existing-home price for all housing types was $223,700 in May, a 2.1% decline year-over-year, marking the 10th consecutive month of year-over-year declines.
- NAR senior economist Lawrence Yun said the market softness is understandable, and that apart from the fundamental factors of too much housing supply, unsustainable pricing structure and tightened lending standards in the wake of the subprime mortgage meltdown, psychological factors are currently the biggest drag on housing. Seriously, he said that.
- “I think psychological factors are currently the biggest drag on the housing market," in addition to all that other stuff, he added.
- Yun also note that “Household formation has slowed dramatically since late 2006, implying that many people are doubling-up – they’re adding roommates or moving in with parents." You know, the typical stuff people do... during an economic depression.
2. Who Cares? Part I
Question: Why is it stocks don't really seem to care about anything - subprime mortgage woes, potential derivatives dislocations, Bear Stearns?
Answer: Because stocks do best when things seem the worst.
- Jon Markman on the Minyanville Buzz and Banter this morning pointed out a Gallup Poll showing that the general public is more pessimistic about the future today than at any time in the last 15 years.
- In a poll last week asking, "In general, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the way things are going in the U.S. at this time?" a whopping 74% reported dissatisfaction, while only 24% reported satisfaction.
Click to enlarge:
- By comparison, Markman noted that in January 2000 69% of Americans reported they were "satisfied" compared with 28% who reported feeling "dissatisfied."
3. Who Cares? Part II
Question: Why is it lenders don't really seem to care about anything - subprime mortgage woes, potential derivatives dislocations, Bear Stearns?
Answer: Because of a seemingly endless supply of cheap money.
- This is generally what is meant when someone says "excess liquidity."
- What does such availability of money look like? How does it influence asset prices?
- Consider the following from a recent Wall Street Journal Op-Ed piece written by Steven Rattner, managing principal of the private investment firm Quadrangle Group LLC: In 2006, a record 20.9% of new high-yield lending went to weak borrowers with at least one rating starting with a "C." So far this year, that figure is at 33%.
- In recent months, lower credit bonds have traded at a smaller risk premium (as compared to U.S. Treasuries) than ever before in history, Rattner wrote.
Click to enlarge:
- America's general mood aside, it helps that "money" today is available in quantities, and at prices, never before seen in the modern-day history of financial markets.
- Of course, as Rattner pointed out, a mere 0.8% of high-yield bonds defaulted last year, the lowest in modern times.
- And so far this year there has been only three defaults.
- By comparison, high-yield default rates have averaged 3.4% since 1970.
- The result is a familiar cocktail: increased competition among lenders for business resulting in cheaper loans and increasingly relaxed lending standards.
- Hmmm. Where have we tasted that combination before?
4. Conspiracy of Excess Liquidity Mongers
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Excess liquidity and blah blah asset bubbles blah blah blah.
- We know what you're thinking: This is just the kind of doomsterism we've come to expect from perma bears, conspiracy theorists and... the Bank for International Settlements?
- It's true.
- Conspiracy of Excess Liquidity mongers at the BIS, in its annual report released today, are saying the credibility of central banks around the world may hinge on their response to surging money and credit growth, which is helping fuel asset bubbles, Bloomberg reported.
"In this environment, there was a moderate tightening of monetary policies in many countries, although overall monetary and financial conditions remained highly accommodative. In part this was due to real policy rates remaining rather low, with associated effects on long-term interest rates. But it was also due to an increased willingness of lenders to advance credit to high-risk borrowers with less onerous conditionality than in the past. While the credit cycle has peaked in the subprime mortgage market in the United States, the expansion has continued in most other areas. As a result, global asset prices either continued to rise or were maintained at unusually high levels." - Just last week in Five Things "Defending M3" we noted European Central Bank Jean-Claude Trichet's admonition to fellow central bankers not to ignore movements in money growth.
- But look, that's just the president of the ECB and the BIS talking.
Yesterday we ran across a positively glowing portrait of U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke in the New York Times. What a difference a day makes.
5. What a Difference a Day Makes
they say it and other banking regulators largely shirked during the housing boom, Bloomberg reported.
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange |
|
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
| add rss feed | free article alerts |
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides
















