IPO: Idiotic Public Offering

Scott Reeves  Sep 04, 2008 11:00 am

IPO: Idiotic Public Offering
 
A brief history of premature capitalization.
 

 
It’s hard to imagine a world without eBay, Amazon.com,  Intel, Microsoft, Dell and Apple.

It’s also easy to forget that these icons of American inventiveness nourished by Wall Street were once unproven companies and their successful IPOs helped create markets that didn’t previously exist.

Go nerds and all that, but hat tips are boring.

It’s more fun -- and edifying, in a business-school sort of way -- to remember colossal IPO flops. There were also dot-bomb era deals that would have flopped, had the company in question not been too ethereal. That was a new-issues market hooked on silliness - or at least on hope for future glory based on nothing more than a history of losses and what looked like a killer business plan (at least at the time).

Many IPOs burned through millions of dollars. Some gullible (or willfully ignorant) investors lost money.

The basic reason: in the early 1990s, the Internet was new, unproven and its future development was unclear. For some IPO investors, the attitude was: “We don’t understand this Internet thing, but it’s hot, it’s filled with golly-gee-wow potential so let’s shovel money into its maw.”

This approach created a lot of clunk-headed ideas backed by uninformed investors, a recipe for what Wall Street delicately calls “negative returns.”

Here are some of the most amazing all-time losers, including a glorious stinker that flopped before filing an IPO registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

Webvan:
OK, kids, get out your crayons and write 10 times: Margins are razor thin in the grocery business; success therefore depends on volume while holding down costs.

Somehow, the aspiring geniuses who founded Webvan overlooked the basics. The company used the Internet as a grand ordering device and promised delivery within 30 minutes of the customer’s chosen drop-off time. Webvan once served ten U.S. markets, including the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles, Seattle, Chicago and Atlanta, and talked grandly of expansion.

But it turns out warehouses are expensive. Then you have to staff and stock them and hire others to deliver the goods. Come to think of it, fuel is also expensive.

Webvan raised about $375 million in an IPO. That’s a hefty pile of cash for a bad idea, even one hatched during the height of Internet mania.

Minyanville rating: Exceeds the highest expectations of Doofusville.

Remember Kibu.com? Didn't think so. Click through to read about its improbable rise and predictable fall.
Rate this article:  (0 Votes)
Comments (4) See All Comments »
09-04-2008, 12:15 pm

A funny article.
By the way, I know of two people at companies like this who got very rich. And in both cases it was in a strange way.
They were at similar companies, and were founders. When they realized that the business mod
Read More
09-04-2008, 1:15 pm
THE MENTAL mIDGETS WHO BASH hlth AND WEBMD ARE TOTAL MORONS, OUT OF THEIR LEAGUE. wYGOD HAS MORE BUSINESS ACUMEN IN HIS TOENAIL THAN THE AUTHORS HAVE IN THEIR CONEHEADS. LOOK AT HIS HISTORY, REPLY TO IT. THE STREET HAS NO CLUE TO WHAT HE IS DOING. IF
Read More
09-04-2008, 8:00 pm
That with a little thought most of those biz plans could have been brought into a focus that didn't claim to dominate the world, but which could be quite profitable.

Delivering cat litter by UPS doesn't make much sense, but d
Read More
09-05-2008, 2:15 am
As a stock holder of eBay I wish I had never heard of eBay. Three years ago I invested a good chunk of my money in eBay thinking this was a great company! Three years later I am down 41% as of today!

eBay may be the talk of the town but
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »AMZN »F »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert