Credit-Card Rules, Unintended Consequences

Charles Payne  Dec 15, 2008 8:45 am

Credit-Card Rules, Unintended Consequences
 
New regulations could worsen economic inequality.
 

 
It’s only 35 days now until one of the biggest parties in the history of America - the day that Obama assumes the presidency. The challenges faced by this president are even greater now than they were on November 4th, impossible as that is to imagine.

As for the solutions: Yes, we’re going to print money to jumpstart the economy - but how do we keep it going once it’s started? Consider the plight of US automakers. I can’t fathom how they’ll stay in business without government loans, or tax incentives for would-be buyers to pick them over their rivals. And those rivals employ 425,000 Americans - which makes it a lot harder to discriminate against them. You’ve embraced the urgency of going green, so it’s unlikely there will be an end to the onerous CAFÉ standards - and that will make Detroit’s recovery impossible, in my estimation.

Unless, of course, the government never closes the spigot. Maybe taxpayers could prop them up forever - but that would be unfair. On the topic of unfairness; Given tougher regulations and limited credit, how will people even get money to buy new cars or homes?

I’ve always worried that the knee-jerk reaction to the housing correction would mean prohibitively tougher standards and substantially fewer options for people on the margins. Millions of Americans will be shut out of homeownership. Decades of progress for African-Americans and Hispanics will be reversed, since banks won’t risk lending to folks with lower FICO scores. It may require delicate legislation - but then again, the Community Reinvestment Act was supposed to be the law that leveled the playing field.

It’s a serious conundrum, to be sure. This week we’ll actually see a change in the rules governing credit-card companies - the kind of change that makes you recognize the truth in the old saying, “Be careful what you wish for.”

Admittedly, many subprime credit-card issuers have run roughshod over the public. These cards begin with an APR of 9.9% or so, but could skyrocket to 25% or more, sometimes overnight. Obviously, that simply isn’t fair. So the Fed plans to enact at least 5 new rules this week, one of which prohibits issuers to change rates on existing account balances. On the surface, these rules make sense.

However, there could be serious unintended consequences. These same lenders have to assess risk: And if they aren’t able to adjust their rates to meet the economic reality of the broader economy, they will simply cut back on the number of cards they issue. This could be horrible news for the general public, but especially for minorities, who now face a world in which they are unable to secure any form of personal credit.

I’m not sure how our new president is going to address this situation. It’s Main Street stuff, and it’s real. Right now, it’s a given that even well-run businesses and individuals with exemplary credit ratings are having difficulty borrowing - imagine what poorer folks will be facing.

Once the dust settles, we will see credit return to the haves - but the American Dream will actually be further out of reach for the have-nots. It’s going to take some serious magic to figure out how to stop abuses, but still make certain that high-risk people are able to access that Dream.
Rate this article:  (0 Votes)
Comments (9) See All Comments »
12-15-2008, 5:31 pm
This article reads somewhat like a fairytale, so here's my once-upon-a-time response.

Once upon a time, credit history was just that. It was a complete transparent history of a persons borrowing and repayment. Credit was laddered
Read More
12-15-2008, 5:39 pm
The failure of the logic is in the failure to recognize reality: Credit card companies LOVE bad credit. Bad credit means a higher profit margin on higher risk. Sure, they see some defaults, but they also use those defaults to justify higher interest
Read More
12-15-2008, 5:45 pm
It's about needs and usefulness of the car companies. Nationalization (continued government support) is fine, but it becomes like the military. Instead of a market determining the types and models, the government could possibly do so from resea
Read More
12-15-2008, 10:20 pm
This whole article reeks of how the poor uncreditworthy will no longer be given credit that they cant pay back.

YOU are what is wrong with the US.

The ONLY key to success is EDUCATION. Your race and background do not matter
Read More
12-15-2008, 11:40 pm
Everyone is talking about consumer debt! Turns out there are several other kinds, many of which will never know or care about your skin colour, ethnicity, whatever.

I'm a bit taken aback by Fred's comments about the apartm
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »RIMM »AMZN »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert