Why Debt is Now Best Bet

Bennet Sedacca  Nov 17, 2008 1:20 pm

Why Debt is Now Best Bet
 
Finally: Market again rewarding risk-takers.
 

 
Why Debt is Now the Best Proposition

Most market players, present company included, are faced daily with the choice of which asset class possesses the best risk/reward characteristics. Considering that I believe that earnings estimates for stocks in are at best, optimistic, or at worst, impossible to predict, this leads us to more “traditional” valuation measure like “Graham and Dodd” analysis or the “Tobin Q Ratio” (Market Value/Net Worth).

As you can see in the chart below, the market would need to be carved in half yet again to reach the secular bear lows of the early 1980”s, a number (S&P 400-500) that is actually my ultimate goal for this bear market before rallying back to 800 or so.

Tobin's Q for S&P 500


Click to enlarge

Got Debt?

While I have highlighted the over-leveraging of the world over the past 10 years or so, we do get to a point when markets fully price in bad news, or for that matter, overshoot to the upside or downside. I believe that long-term investors (folks that can actually withstand interim volatility) are now being properly compensated for taking credit risk.

Spreads could blow out further, but the yield along the way is an excellent proposition, particularly when compared to stocks.

Agency Mortgage Backed Securities in general are appearing to be a good risk/reward proposition based on an OAS (Option Adjusted Spread) basis, and even high-grade corporate bonds and yes, even junk bonds are a good proposition.

Please note: While my firm is a significant player in the MBS market, we have no position in corporate bonds, nor are we likely to in the near future. We are completely avoiding the preferred and hybrid (perpetual “fixed-to-floating) markets, as I wouldn't be stunned to see Uncle Sam tell banks and finance companies that they aren”t allowed to pay dividends in the not-too-distant future (let”s face it, banks are now socialized utilities).

Considering that nearly 90% of issuance has been in financials, I would stay away - in fact, very far away. Municipals are tempting, but lack liquidity; the housing crisis has yet to be completely felt in that arena, and I don't feel capable of doing credit research on the nearly 50,000 issuers with municipal debt outstanding.
Rate this article: (0 Votes)
Comments (6) See All Comments »
11-17-2008, 1:57 pm
Ginnie Mae Funds
Read More
11-17-2008, 2:41 pm
Bennet,

Thank you for sharing this excellent analysis with us.
It sure gives one pause to think about the risk/reward ratio,
of various investment options in this "unique" situation we find ourselves in.

Read More
11-17-2008, 2:48 pm
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/16/opinion/16friedman.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Read More
11-17-2008, 4:41 pm
Is that municipalities will continue to exist, as they "always" have in the recent past.
If cities go bankrupt, your analysis will fail, won't it? There are a lot of stressors on towns and cities that weren't there durin
Read More
11-19-2008, 5:03 pm
Forgive me for what I'm sure is a dumb question - I'm new to this.

How do you make 6-7% on a GNMA when you have to pay a premium? Or are you saying you got into them when they were issued around par?

Thanks to a
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
Positions in mortgage-backed securities

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any article or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Publishing and Multimedia, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Markets

our professors

rss article alert