Sympathy For The Borrower? Rod David Jul 15, 2008 1:45 pm |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
I have a rule: Never ask a technician for a fundamental opinion. The rule may not apply to all technicians universally, but it certainly applies to me. Speaking as a technician, I'll gladly extend this rule to economics. If you must ask me about personal finance, please limit your questions to topics such as whether the 64-ounce jar of Skippy peanut butter is a better deal at twice the price of a 36-ounce jar of Jif Chunky.
Speaking of which, this story seemed a little nutty to me:
The FDIC took control of IndyMac (IMB) on Friday, and announced yesterday a halt to the former thrift's foreclosures. Instead, it will "pursue loan-modification strategies" - other than the modification strategy of foreclosure, I imagine.
This embodies FDIC Chairwoman Sheila Blair, who wants to see solvent banks act with similar mercy. Thumbs up to you, Madame Chairwoman!
Thumbs up from borrowers, that is. As for depositors, not so much. Hundreds of them lined up to withdraw funds at IndyMac branches Monday. Maybe it's just me, but that seems sort of ungrateful, given the fact that IndyMac is also reimbursing 50% of deposits above the $100,000 FDIC insurance. level
Is that what's left, or is it all being supplied by you and me?
To be sure, there are parts of society that deserve protection from free market forces, ranging from relatively incapacitated individuals to national security interests. Not requiring protection are upside-down homeowners, cash-strapped borrowers and under-insured depositors. My heart goes out to them, but why must my wallet follow?
Perhaps this is the silver lining to socializing, errr, nationalizing, ummm, saving -- yeah, saving, that's the ticket -- "saving" failing banks: The FDIC (you, me and my wallet again) will then improve conditions for consumers so that they'll stop dragging the economy down.
No doubt restoring the consumer's health is a big step on the path to recovery - or one path at least. But is it the right one? Despite their best efforts to rationalize this degree of intervention, there's no happy medium between laissez-faire and a yet heavier-handed government. Once you go down that path, you're on that path, no matter how briefly the present administration promises to remain on it.
Wouldn't USD buybacks have gotten a bigger bang for the buck, as it were? Maybe the government isn't viewing this as an either/or proposition, and Dollar intervention is coming next. I would have rather any intervention at all be focused entirely on restoring the Dollar's health, instead of shoring up capital for private institutions and individuals.
But nobody asked me - I'm just a technician, with a coupon for 20 cents off Skippy.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange |
|
No positions in stocks mentioned.
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
| add rss feed | free article alerts |
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides


















