Op-Ed: Black Swan Nation, Part 1 Minyanville Staff Sep 22, 2008 1:24 pm |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
In January 1995, the NASDAQ was at the 750 level. On March 10, 2000, the market peaked at 5,132, an increase of 584% in 5 years.
In a 1996 speech, Greenspan warned that the US economy was suffering from “irrational exuberance.” The following day, the stock market dropped significantly. Mr. Greenspan never used the term again.
As the economy heated up in the late 1990s and Wall Street started pushing IPOs like Pets.com -- many of which soared by 500% to 1000% on the day they were issued -- Greenspan didn’t take away the punch bowl before the party got out of hand, as he should have done. If he’d increased margin requirements, or interest rates, day traders wouldn’t have had the money to propel the markets to such ridiculous heights.
As the year 2000 approached -- along with ridiculous fears of the “Y2K crash” --Greenspan flooded the economy with cash, which immediately flowed into dot-com stocks and pushed the NASDAQ to its epic peak, a level that won’t be seen again for decades.
The technology-heavy NASDAQ Composite index peaked at 5,048 in March 2000, reflecting the high point of the dot-com bubble.
Robert Shiller, professor at Yale, published Irrational Exuberance in early 2000. The book poked holes in Wall Street’s rationale for stocks being as high as they were, arguing that a complete disconnect had occurred between earnings and the level of the stock market.
Shiller argued that “positive feedback loops” among investors led to herd-like behavior and created a “naturally occurring Ponzi process; furthermore, this feedback loop was based on the “indifferent thinking, emotions, random attentions and perceptions of conventional wisdom" of millions of people. In short, he effectively concluded that the “efficient market theory” was a load of crap.
In the real world, people aren’t rational machines. You can’t model human behavior - very disappointing for academics and “scientists” at investment banks.
All previous speculative peaks in 1901, 1929, and 1966 resulted in subpar stock returns for 2 decades thereafter. The peak reached in March 2000 far exceeded any in history, as millions of people piled into the stock market. A sort of collective delusion overcame the country.
The dot-com crash wiped out $5 trillion in market value of technology companies from March 2000 to October 2002. Communications companies, overburdened by massive amounts of debt, filed for bankruptcy.
WorldCom, run by Bernie Ebbers, was found to have used illegal accounting practices to overstate its profits by billions of dollars. The company's stock crashed when these irregularities were revealed, and within days it filed the largest corporate bankruptcy in U.S. history. Ebbers went to prison. Wall Street “analysts” were discredited; some were prosecuted for touting worthless stocks as buys.
The trigger for the collapse were Greenspan’s 6 interest-rate increases, culminating in a rate of 6% by late 2000. The collapse of the internet bubble, the resulting reduction in business activity and the increase in interest rates combined to push the country into recession. Alan Greenspan and George W. Bush have one thing in common: They don’t believe in recessions. Greenspan rapidly decreased the Fed discount rate from 6% to 3.5% by September 2001.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange |
|
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
| add rss feed | free article alerts |
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides


















