Banks Brace for Stress Tests

Andrew Jeffery  Feb 24, 2009 9:15 am

Banks Brace for Stress Tests
 
Regulators want to see just how much pain financials can endure.
 

 
The next step is to assume things get worse than expected - say, a 40% peak-to-trough decline in property values. More losses would ensue, and, after tallying each bank’s projected losses, officials can try to determine how much capital banks need to to remain solvent through this “worst-case scenario.”

After injecting the requisite capital to keep banks alive if things get really, really bad, newfound confidence could entice private capital back into the market. At least, that's the theory. If instead they find out certain banks wouldn't survive without massive amounts of capital, they could then become targets for nationalization.

Myriad troubles arise with this approach, bold as it may be. A few to consider:

First, selecting the “worst case” is problematic, particularly since conditions during this crisis have gotten worse than almost anyone expected. Anyone in Washington, that is, since many private commentators had been saying the sky is falling for years. Still, regulators have to make guesses about how bad things could possibly get, and their guesses could be wrong.

Second, any assumptions about future losses are based on guesses based on assumptions based on guesses based on assumptions based on wild stabs in the dark. In short, the complexity of the global financial system, the unintended consequences of various government actions, and a general difficulty predicting the future, make predictions exactly that - predictions.

Third, and possibly most importantly, regulators have lost almost all credibility over the past 18 months.

Some may argue that the guys in charge are different, but that’s just not the case. Ben Bernanke still runs the Federal Reserve, Tim Geithner ran the New York Fed for the past 5 years, Lawrence Summers is back at the economic helm, and Barney Frank and Chris Dodd are still mouthing off on Capitol Hill. Sure, there's a different face in the White House - but by and large the same folks who got us into this mess are now trying to get us out.

The American public recognizes this, investors recognize this, and the world recognizes it.

Even if the stress tests go off without a hitch and Geithner and Obama loudly proclaim the banking system is safe and sound, the market may simply, quietly shrug - and continue heading south.
6 of 6 (100%) found this helpful
Rate this article:  (6 Votes)
Comments (3) See All Comments »
02-25-2009, 8:15 am
You are directly on point but are too nuanced.

FDR's gamble paid off. Nobody called him on his bank holiday bluff. You are right to point out that many of the banks in the 1930s could not have been re-opened that fast if a decent
Read More
02-26-2009, 7:59 am
Well, mostly I wanted to use that heading. Mr. Sinacori made most of my points for me.
The stress test has alredy been conducted, and Citi-Corpse et al have already left this earthly coil. Much Citi should/has just been bought (be idealistic M
Read More
02-26-2009, 8:06 am
That should be "Gangster Logicians", and "cocoon". But those models still need to be spanked.
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
F »AMZN »HIG »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert