Decade-Defining Brands: OPEC Scott Reeves May 06, 2009 8:15 am |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||
| more Decade-Defining Brands » | |||||
|
Thanks to the worldwide recession, OPEC warns of a “devastating contraction” in demand for oil and falling prices.
It may cut production in an effort to boost prices, or at least to prevent a sharp drop, but OPEC’s warning underscores a basic point: Even a cartel providing the key commodity to the world’s economy can’t escape market forces.
But not for lack of trying - or lack of prior success. OPEC defined the 1970s with an embargo that nearly quadrupled the price of oil and created long lines at gas stations. So, how did it acquire all that power?
Unlike coffee or chocolate, there's no substitute for oil, making it the ideal product for a cartel.
OPEC, short for the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, is best known for the 1973 embargo the sent the price of a barrel of oil to about $11.65 from $3. Thanks to the embargo, the US economy shrank by about 6% a year for 2 years.
Early in the 20th Century, oil producing countries lacked exploration technology and production skills, leaving them unable to challenge Exxon (XOM), Shell (RDS.A), British Petroleum (BP), Gulf, Texaco, Mobil and Chevron (CVX) -- then known as the "seven sisters" -- on price. But in 1943, Venezuela signed the first 50-50 deal with the oil companies that called for an even split of profits on top of a royalty. Saudi Arabia quickly demanded -- and got -- a similar deal.
The US had been a net exporter of oil until about 1948 when domestic producers could no longer compete with cheap foreign supply. In 1959, British Petroleum single-handedly cut crude oil prices about 10%, raising howls from the producing countries. In August 1960, a second price cut was announced, and in September Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela responded by forming OPEC in an effort to gain some control over pricing.
Initially, OPEC succeeded in halting a decline in prices, but was unable to significantly boost them. One reason: Cartel members have incentive to cheat by boosting production.
The incentive to cheat generally results in the breakup of a cartel, but OPEC remained intact, in part, because its portion of the world’s production rose to about 41% in 1970 from 28% in 1960.
Few Americans paid any attention to OPEC until the Israel-Egypt war in October 1973. Saudi Arabia refused to boost output to counter rising prices unless the US backed the Arab world. The US refused. When President Nixon proposed a $2.2 billion million aid package for Israel, Arab states halted oil shipments to the US.
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange |
|
No positions in stocks mentioned.
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
| add rss feed | free article alerts |
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides


















