Reports of Economy's Recovery Have Been Greatly Exaggerated John Mauldin Jun 22, 2009 11:05 am |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
As a society, we're having to work through the excesses of a lifestyle that was propped up by ever-increasing debt and an out-of-control consumerism. That will happen in the fullness of time. But it will take time, and we need to adjust our expectations to account for that.
Over the next few weeks, I'm going to drill down into the data to show why recovery will take longer and to help you withstand what will be an onslaught of out-of-control bullishness over data that's not so much good as "less bad." Let's start with a few easy targets.
The 3 Amigos
Earlier in my career, I wrote about the "3 amigos" -- 3 indicators of the economy's direction: capacity utilization, high-yield bonds, and the (renamed) ISM numbers. Watching the direction they're moving gives you a good idea of where the economy's headed.
We saw above that capacity utilization is still in a cliff dive. For there to be an actual recovery, we need to see capacity utilization start to climb back up. That's not currently a very positive indicator.
Credit Spreads -- Bullish or Bearish?
A number of commentators have been effusive about how credit spreads have "come back in." Indeed, junk-bond yields have fallen, which is a good thing. Look at the graph below (courtesy of Tony Boehk).

Click to Enlarge.
Note that yields have simply come down to levels associated with recessions, and not with actual recovery. Last year, Armageddon was priced in to junk-bond yields. Now, only recession and slow recovery are priced into them. Could they improve more? Certainly. But the easy lifting is done. The direction is right. Let's see how they do the next few months. If those yields keep falling, that would be a very positive sign.
Institute for Supply Management -- Is Less Bad That Good?
The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) released their data for May, and again commentators were enthusiastic about the increase in the manufacturing index. Stories of Green shoots and other wonderful signs were all over the media.
The ISM is a survey of manufacturers about how their businesses are doing. They're surveyed on 10 criteria, lsuch as new orders, employment, inventories, backlog of orders, and so on.
From these responses the ISM creates an index. An index number above 50 means that the manufacturing sector is growing, and below 50 means it's shrinking. At the website above, you can get quite a bit of detail. It's quite true that we've come back from the lowest overall index number in 30 years. But we're simply back to the lowest level in the previous 2 recessions. The ISM number is "less bad" and that's a good thing, but it's still a bad number. It's headed in the right direction. Let's look at the actual chart.

Click to Enlarge.
Of course, as businesses adjust to the new normal, whatever that level is, year-over-year comparisons will start to be positive. Simplistically, if a business makes 500 widgets a month and sales fall to 300, they will likely report falling production and rising inventories. Over time, inventories will finally settle out as management adjusts, and at some point inventories and production will hopefully start to rise. This gets reported as positive. The actual numbers may be down from the peak, but the direction of the company is, once again, on a positive slope.
When you look at the actual numbers comprising the release, the manufacturing part of the US economy is still contracting. Is it less bad than a few quarters ago? Yes, but it's still bad. The recent number is only slightly higher than the average for the last 12 months. We need this number to be above 50 to talk about an actual recovery in the here and now, as opposed to the future.
Contain Your Enthusiasm
Shipping containers moving into US ports rose by 2% in April, from March. That was cause for celebration in some circles. Buried way down, if mentioned at all, was the fact that, compared to a year ago, shipping is down 22%. And year-over-year comparisons have been worse for 22 months in a row. At some point, you get to a bottom. We find the new normal. But if the new normal is down 20%, that's a different-looking economy.
Here's something to think about from Dennis Gartman:"According to the data reported out by the International Air Transport Association, after having touched just barely under $60 billion in '07 and '08, this year the IATA 'guesstimates' that only $40-$42 billion will move into the US.
"We are effectively back to the levels of '00-'04 and we are well below anything since '05.
Welcome to the new normal. It's a quite distinctively different world from that of 2006. Global trade is off 10%, and there's outright deflation in many places.
When it comes to thinking "This time, it's different," human nature hasn't changed. We're still driven by fear and greed. The business cycle hasn't been repealed. Free-market capitalism will get us back (with a few new rules of engagement). What's different will be the nature of this recovery. All the other eternal truths will remain.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange |
|
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
| add rss feed | free article alerts |
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides


















