CEO Severance Pay: Why Losers Often Win Big

Cory Bortnicker  Sep 17, 2008 11:15 am

CEO Severance Pay: Why Losers Often Win Big
 
Rewarding incompetence, missteps and blunders.
 

 
Sometimes huge mistakes pay off. In 1492, Christopher Columbus’s cartographical miscalculations led to his discovery of the New World. In 1928, Scottish biologist Alexander Fleming inadvertently discovered penicillin by accidentally killing a bacterial culture he was working on in his lab.

And in 2008, Martin J. Sullivan, the CEO of AIG (AIG), mistakenly steered his company through 2 quarters of record losses, but was buoyed by the news that his imminent departure would earn him another $47 million.

Okay, scientific serendipity and CEO severance pay may not be exactly the same thing, but there is a common thread: Sometimes losers can win big. In the cases of Columbus and Fleming, you might argue that they just got lucky. But for CEOs like Sullivan, there are actual reasons -- economic ones -- why their incompetence is rewarded.

But first, a word from the naysayers - and there are many quick to condemn the outlandish sums of money paid to defrocked CEOs. Who can blame them? After the government’s bailout of Fannie Mae (FNM), CEO Dan Mudd stood to gain $9.3 million in severance pay.  Freddie Mac’s (FRE) Richard Syron was on his way to a cool $14.1 million. The public backlash was immediate.

"It's a stretch to make a case that either CEO deserves a severance payment," said Amy Borrus, deputy director at the Council of Institutional Investors, on Marketwatch. "Investors are taking huge hits from the losses."

Mudd and Syron are just the latest in a long line of CEOs whose poor performance set the stage for massive personal gains. But they would hardly have been the largest benefactors: Robert Nardelli, former CEO of Home Depot (HD), received a whopping $210 million in severance pay. Disney’s (DIS) Michael Ovitz received $140 million. Hewlett-Packard’ (HPQ) Carly Fiorina received $21 million.


If only professional failure were rewarded so handsomely across the board. Hell, couldn’t we all go home?

Not exactly. According to one study from Northwestern University ’s Kellogg School of Management, there’s a big, big difference between your job and that of a chief executive - one that means CEOs deserve every severance penny they get.
Rate this article:  (0 Votes)
Comments (7) See All Comments »
09-17-2008, 11:28 am
The have's get more have and the not's get more not. The trend stops when there is tea in the harbor.
Read More
09-17-2008, 11:37 am
Agree 100% with you. Annual meetings should become a forum where shareholders literally stand up and speak out.
Read More
09-17-2008, 1:02 pm
one thing that is often overlooked like with fre and fnm. These ceo's are often brought into a very difficult situation and must try to rescue the company and its shareholders. Now in Fannie and Freddies case it didn't work that doesn&
Read More
09-17-2008, 7:56 pm
Was that study by the "...school of mismanagement" ? Lame apologist excuses....

Couldn't agree more with Dean saying the risk reward comes from stock options, and CEO's already get paid xx times more than middle
Read More
09-18-2008, 8:11 am
Yep.

Unless you started the company, I fail to see how the risk any CEO takes on worth multiples of the risk that middle management takes on. (I'd say the middle is worse - trouble comes from above and below.)

Increas
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »AMZN »F »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert