You Are What You Eat

Cory Bortnicker  Mar 14, 2008 2:00 pm

You Are What You Eat
 
Brand loyalty and the organic revolution.
 

 
C-Town, a local grocery store in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn, doesn’t look like your neighborhood Whole Foods (WFMI). It’s wedged between high-rise projects and graffiti covers its crumbling brick exterior. Inside, its customer service desk sits behind a wall of thick bulletproof glass. But even here you can find hormone-free eggs hatched from free range chickens.

That’s because the organic food industry -- equal parts big business and cultural sensation -- knows few boundaries. Revenue for this sector continues to grow at a rate of 18.7% annually. For a little perspective, back in 1997 organic food represented only 0.8% of the food market. Experts now predict that number will grow to about 4.8% by 2010.

And no one is profiting more than organic food’s flagship – Whole Foods.

A little background. Before acquiring chief rival Wild Oats for $565 million last August, Whole Foods brought in 35% of organic food revenue, or approximately $5.8 billion. They opened a record 21 stores in 2007 and plan to do the same this year. Although first- quarter income decreased 27% (on account of the massive Wild Oats purchase), revenue surged 31% to $2.46 billion.

Now, if you’ve been to Whole Foods, this goes without saying: Organic food ain’t cheap. In fact, prices can range anywhere from 20% to 30% to even 100% higher than those at regular grocers. So with an across-the-board consumer slowdown in effect, the question on investors’ minds is whether or not organic food is recession-proof.

According to Whole Foods CEO John Mackey it is.

"Historically, our sales have been highly resilient during economic downturns," Mackey reported in a February 20th conference call. “We attribute [this] to many factors, including loyal core customers and their dedication to a natural and organic lifestyle.”

In other words, Mackey is banking on a single demographic to keep the wheels turning: Organic foodies. Maybe you’ve met one. Hell, maybe you are one. But if you haven’t, or if you aren’t, suffice it to say that these consumers are a committed breed. To them, Whole Foods isn’t just a store, it’s a way of life.

Like the Googles (GOOG), Apples (AAPL), and Starbucks (SBUX) of the world, Whole Foods promotes its products by branding a progressive identity. The company embraces motifs like sustainability and environmental conservation. In its mission statement you’ll find buzz terms like “self-reliability” and “shared fate.”

Consider the advantages inherent in Whole Foods’ brand strategy: Each new report on global warming helps them. Each new report on obesity, pesticides and meat recalls helps, too. Most of the news out there is bad – and most of it can be used to justify why spending the extra money for organic food makes sense. Even when times are tough.

But Whole Foods may not dominate the trend for long. The organic revolution is already spreading virulently into the mainstream. Wal-Mart (WMT), for example, recently announced plans to double its organic offerings.

"We know that customers at all ends of the income spectrum want organic and natural foods," Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott said at the company's general meeting in 2005. “We don't think you should have to have a lot of money to feed your family organic foods."

Neither does Target (TGT). With organic offerings ranging from t-shirts to bath towels, it’s just the latest in a string of big boxes to market the benefits of natural goods. Meanwhile, other grocers like Safeway (SWY), Kroger (KR) and Trader Joe’s continue to gnaw away at Whole Foods’ share of the market.

Truth be told, the organic industry has yet to weather times quite like these. But brand loyalty is one of the best defenses against sinking consumer confidence. Whole Foods -- and the organic industry at large -- will need to continually reinforce the political and cultural undertones of its products if it wants people to cough up the extra cash.
Rate this article:  (0 Votes)
Comments (7) See All Comments »
03-27-2008, 6:46 pm
My problem with Whole Foods is their "high end" presentation which promotes high prices. Trader Joe's has all the same goodies for half the price. Their stores are basic, small, well managed and packed ALL THE TIME. That's som
Read More
03-27-2008, 8:34 pm
The trace organics in the tap water include drugs and drug metabolites. This is inevitable. Modern analytical technique measures them in the parts per trillion and parts per quadrillion and so they show up on tests. They are present like one grain
Read More
03-29-2008, 1:38 am
As a former Whole Foods "Team Member" I have mixed emotions about this company. I worked for WFMI for 18 months, first in Florida and later here in San Diego. I essentially took the job because "trading for a living" was not w
Read More
04-03-2008, 3:31 pm
Thank you for the cogent description of the ins and outs. Your comment that every person should provide some of their own sustenance is also important. Many people think that the high cost of naturally grown foods is because of the rarity or 't
Read More
04-05-2008, 12:48 am
Minyan Dan Conine made some excellent points that i feel are worth fleshing out. Most people do not understand that, not only is petroleum vital to transporting our food to the table, petroleum is the source of most modern chemical fertilizers, pesti
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
F »AMZN »HIG »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert