Microsoft's Bing May Suck Less Than Anticipated

Mike Schuster  Jun 08, 2009 2:45 pm

Microsoft's Bing May Suck Less Than Anticipated
 
New search engine survives its first week.
 

 
On Wednesday, Bing.com -- Microsoft's (MSFT) fourth incarnation of its struggling search engine -- will have been live for one full week. While its success and longevity would be hard to gauge so early on, it's safe to say that it's definitely no Cuil. Then again, it's also certainly no Google (GOOG).

But last Thursday -- riding on a wave of media saturation and advertising to the tune of $100 million -- Bing edged out Yahoo (YHOO) to become the second most-visited search engine on the web. According to web trafficker StatCounter, the day after it launched, Bing amassed a 16.28% share against Yahoo's 10.22%. Google still held a commanding 71.47%. Globally, however, Bing's lead was reduced to a mere 0.49% over Yahoo's 5.13%.

It's a promising start, but Microsoft should wait before breaking out the good champagne. StatCounter notes that the numbers could change after 7 days of analysis and quality-assurance testing. If the stats for Bing are lowered, then Microsoft's claim to "have beaten Ask.com" won't seem so impressive.

With the official launch of Windows 7 a few months away, the Redmond company could use the push of some positive coverage. Vista was a disaster, Zune's struggling to reformat and those Seinfeld ads straddle the line between "forgettable" and "regrettably memorable." But the reviews for Bing -- which have averaged a resounding "Ehhh, it's all right" -- could quite possibly be the best that Microsoft could hope for in Google's heavy shadow.

In fact, 2 aspects of Bing's engine have been widely regarded as even better than Google's plain-and-simple interface: image search and video search. Though the image search for Bing and Google are both able to specify for things like size, color and style, visitors to Bing have preferred the single-page navigation over the endless click-through of Google's multi-page results.

On the video side, Bing earned some notice for the auto-play preview feature when the cursor is held over the still frame. Of course, Microsoft discovered it could lead to some unfortunate scenarios, such as adult content unexpectedly playing at work.

It's pretty incredible: A company that's flung itself headlong into some pretty devastating ventures has emerged from this one with some warm reviews, and only a few minor snags. But, having spent $100 million on the ad campaign, it should know in which year The Breakfast Club was released -- an error Microsoft made in its first commercial for Bing.
7 of 11 (64%) found this helpful
Rate this article:  (11 Votes)
Comments (4) See All Comments »
06-08-2009, 11:13 am
447 brings up results of plumbers, bombers and area codes in Bing. On Google, it brings up Air France 447 crash. Which site would you go to do search?
Read More
06-08-2009, 2:04 pm
1. Look on the left hand side menu and think about which one you want to search on. There is no default option.
2. Once you have finalized your option, refer to the user manual page Para 3, Sub section 1, Line 37 which states "You will n
Read More
06-08-2009, 4:26 pm
You might want to learn how Bing operates first Swaminathan. Look on the left side then click "NEWS" afterwards type in 447 and the Air France flight is at the top. Overall, I like Bing far better then Google and IMO will chip away at b
Read More
06-08-2009, 5:34 pm
I found some interesting commentary on the curiously named Bing over at On the Button. onthebutton.wordpress.com
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »AMZN »F »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert