The Buying Stampede: Like Lemmings Over a Cliff?

Mr Practical  May 01, 2009 9:35 am

The Buying Stampede: Like Lemmings Over a Cliff?
 
Money coming into market isn't picking stocks on fundamentals - it just wants to be in stocks.
 

 
My friend John told me something arcane, hard to interpret, but perhaps meaningful.

Index option prices have come way down. He measures it by “implied volatility.” For example, with an SPX index option trading at a certain price, his model might say that the price implies at 30 volatility. This means the option price is implying that the index will move up or down 30% over the next year.

Now, an index option price is driven by 2 things: The volatility of all the underlying stocks and the correlation between those stocks. The first part is intuitive; the second is not.

Let’s pretend an index has only 2 stocks in it: A and B. If A goes up and B goes down, they cancel each other out, and the index is unchanged. But if A and B go down together, the index moves a lot. So when the correlation is low between stocks, the index volatility tends to be low; when the correlation between stocks increases, the volatility of the index rises.

Based on the option prices of the underlying stocks as compared to the option price of the index, his model can measure the implied correlation between stocks.

He tells me statistically something is happening the degree of which is very rare. Even though the option prices and the implied volatility of the stocks has dropped a lot, the implied correlation has remained near all-time highs.

After saying “so what,” he finally got to the punch line. This means that -- to a very great degree -- the money coming into the market (as it rises) is almost all coming in through equity index futures.

Even I know what that means: The money coming into the market isn't picking stocks on fundamentals, etc. It just wants to be in stocks.

You can make your own conclusions on that one.
91 of 94 (97%) found this helpful
Rate this article:  (94 Votes)
Comments (16) See All Comments »
05-02-2009, 12:37 pm
Well the Woolly Mammoths actually liked the earth when it was a greenhouse but they can't vote nowadays. Growing crops in the Arctic Circle, Greenland, and northern Canada would feed a lot of people. The downside is that New Orleans would be
Read More
05-02-2009, 9:16 pm
More correctly, MOST of New Orleans would be underwater full- instead of part-time - but the French Quarter (the Old City) was built on the only solid higher ground around, and would remain dry. Well, wet, really, very wet (drink-wise) and fun :)) <
Read More
05-02-2009, 9:20 pm
And don't forget farming, mining and drilling for oil in Antarctica, once a tropical paradise and just loaded (maybe, probably) with exotic dinosaur bones and extra greenhouse goodies. Whee!
Read More
05-03-2009, 10:20 am
As I recall the Ice Age lowered the sea level by 600 feet and we are still down 200 feet. I'll have to check the highest elevation in NO but I doubt it is that high. In any case, it isn't very hard to move a party given a few hundred or
Read More
05-03-2009, 10:25 am
The Sahara desert was the Sahara forest back when the world was a greenhouse. Global warming cools some areas because there is better heat distribution after the ice caps melt.

The first ice age was about 100 million years ago so there
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »AMZN »F »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert