Magazine Survival Depends on Digital

Mike Schuster  Oct 07, 2009 12:00 am

Magazine Survival Depends on Digital
 
Tradition, inexperience, and fear prolong the shift to online.
 

 
Gourmands, harried fiancées, and dentist office waiting rooms were struck a blow on Monday when publishing giant Condé Nast announced the closure of four of its popular magazines after severe drops in ad revenue.

Elegant Bride and Modern Bride will be ceasing publication as well as the soccer mom handbook Cookie. Gourmet will be shuttered at the release of its November 2009 issue, but will live on with TV programming and online recipes.

The closures see roughly 180 employees laid off and a collective circulation of more than four million issues stripped from shelves and mailboxes.

Despite the dedicated readership each magazine held, the publications were at the mercy of a three-month study by the management consulting firm McKinsey & Company. After its analysis, McKinsey advised several Condé magazines to cut 25% from their budgets, but no amount of cost-cutting initiatives was able to save the aforementioned few.

Speaking with The Washington Post, Bob Garfield -- a columnist at Advertising Age -- had a grim view of what print publishing's future had in store.

"Your content can be flawless and you can still fail," the Chaos Scenario author said. "The Internet has created a nearly infinite supply of content… which leads to declining revenue and declining ad prices. What you have is a spiraling vortex of ruin. The reason Gourmet is dead is because we are all doomed."

Albeit a tad bleak, Garfield makes strong points about publishers' unpreparedness and/or unwillingness to shift to a working digital model. How so? He made those points three and a half years ago, and little has changed.

Because print publication has worked for centuries, department heads are naturally hesitant to take on a new venture. Those who were slow to adapt were left behind, but those who jumped into unfamiliar waters without adequate planning suffered a similar fate.

Last Wednesday, journalists and publishers met at the UC Berkeley Media Technology Summit to discuss the future of digital publishing. Representatives from Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), CNN (TWX), and Salon Media (SLNM) addressed the problems that have plagued earlier ventures into online publishing.

At the summit, former editor of The Rocky Mountain News John Temple admitted, "We did not have a clear strategy, mission, or objective. The web was a complement to the paper. That's not a strategy."

Temple's mistakes don't stand alone. Efforts to charge for online content have proven to be a failing model almost everywhere given the glut of similar information available for free.
6 of 6 (100%) found this helpful
Rate this article:  (6 Votes)
Comment (1) See All Comments »
10-08-2009, 3:10 pm
I think the moral of the story wrt print media is that whatever media model ultimately succeeds is going to be a transformational one, not merely iterative.

Look at it this way. You have folks like Google, which on the one hand are nati
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
F »AMZN »HIG »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert